Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S10e's 86.3 score. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also a bit thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy S10e and Samsung Galaxy A90 5G both have incredibly similar CPUs, they have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S10e features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A90 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy S10e's memory to store more apps and games is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 45% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.