Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A90 5G's global score of 90.5. The Galaxy S20 body is just a little bit thinner and extremely lighter than the Galaxy A90 5G, even though both were only released 6 months apart. Galaxy S20 works with Android 13 OS, while Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a greater pixels count in each inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S20 features just a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and better 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.