Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, with a 95.4 score against 90.5. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's, but it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with Android 13 OS, while Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a higher screen density and a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot larger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality, a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.