Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android |
| 2019-09-04 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.27 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Galaxy S24 Ultra, getting a overall score of 90.5 against 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit sharper display than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a little smaller screen, a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little worse pixel amount per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution camera. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S24 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.