Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-04 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 7.27 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's overall score of 90.5. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14 OS, and Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra body is a lot thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a higher pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a much higher 200 megapixels resolution. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a slightly better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.