Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-09-04 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, getting a 90.5 score against 80.9. The Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with Android 5.0 OS. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bit CPU. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.