Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, having a overall score of 90.5 against 85.6. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy A90 5G is an older, heavier and somewhat thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. The Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with Android 11 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy A90 5G, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has more RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.