Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's overall score of 90.5. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G. Galaxy Z Flip 5G comes with Android 11 operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a bit greater screen density and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A90 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot better 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has slightly more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.