Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is slightly better than Galaxy A90 5G, with a 94.6 score against 90.5. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is notably heavier than the Galaxy A90 5G, it's thinner and newer. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with Android 11 OS, while Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a screen that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G one, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels. The Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 have extremely similar battery performance. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments, a smaller back-facing camera sensor and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.