Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | -- |
| 2019-09-04 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Sony Xperia XZs, with a 90.5 score against 77.2. Galaxy A90 5G's design is incredibly newer, but a little bit thicker and way heavier than Sony Xperia XZs. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy A90 5G and Xperia XZs count with similar screens, because although the Xperia XZs has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a really smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixels number in each inch of screen. The Galaxy A90 5G features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZs, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2900mAh. Sony Xperia XZs takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality photos, a camera in the back with a much lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.