Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is just a bit better than the Galaxy C7, having a score of 84.5 against 77.7. Apple iPhone XS Max's design is a lot newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than the Galaxy C7. The iPhone XS Max counts with a superior processing unit than Galaxy C7, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XS Max features a more vivid screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a better 1242 x 2688 resolution, a bit greater pixels number per inch in the screen and a quite bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy C7 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy C7 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 128 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 features a little longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The iPhone XS Max captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.