Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 score. The Google Pixel 2 body is somewhat thicker but notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. Google Pixel 2 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 2 features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 1920, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a bit greater display pixels density. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot higher video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better photography in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 48 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.