Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has the previous 6.0 Marshmallow version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Galaxy C9 Pro is an older and somewhat heavier device than the LG G7 Fit, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The LG G7 Fit counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a little bit bigger screen and much more pixels per inch of screen.
LG G7 Fit captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or videos in low light situations, and they both have a same resolution camera, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The LG G7 Fit features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy C9 Pro features longer battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.