Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is just a bit better than LG V10's 78.6 score. The Galaxy C9 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little lighter and noticeably thinner than LG V10. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while LG V10 has Android 5.1, counting with a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG V10, because it has more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG V10 features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
LG V10 features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V10 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V10 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 16 megapixels, the LG V10 also has a way higher video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.