Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 general score. Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a much newer and a little lighter device than the Galaxy C9 Pro, although it is also somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 Lite has the older 11 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better screen density, a little bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution. Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.