Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with a global score of 92.8 against 81. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an older 12 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though the Motorola Edge 20 Pro is notably newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro, it's somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit higher pixel density, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a much higher resolution camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.