Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Interstellar Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a score of 83.4 against 81. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro body is incredibly newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it's just a bit heavier and notably thicker. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an older 13 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a bit larger screen and a just a bit better display density.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera, a bigger camera aperture and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.