Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than Moto G8 Power, having a score of 81 against 76. Galaxy C9 Pro is an much older cellphone than Moto G8 Power, but it is just a little bit lighter and notably thinner anyway. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
Moto G8 Power has a processor that is very similar to the CPU in Galaxy C9 Pro, and although the Moto G8 Power has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Moto G8 Power has just a bit better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2300px resolution, a bit larger display and a little bit better screen density.
Moto G8 Power takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a back camera with a 16 mega-pixels resolution, the Moto G8 Power also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Moto G8 Power has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G8 Power also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G8 Power has better battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.