Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Play, having a general score of 81 against 76.7. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10, so it provides the user some additional features and a performance increase. Despite of the fact that Galaxy C9 Pro is much older than Motorola Moto G9 Play, it's body is a little bit lighter and thinner.
The Moto G9 Play's processing unit is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although the Moto G9 Play has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920px resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Moto G9 Play captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G9 Play also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video and a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Moto G9 Play has just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G9 Play also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G9 Play has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.