Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Blue and Brown |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than Motorola One Vision, getting a score of 81 against 80.7. The Galaxy C9 Pro is a incredibly older and just a bit heavier cellphone than Motorola One Vision, but Samsung was able to build it much thinner anyway. The Motorola One Vision has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels, a little bit larger display and a bit higher display density.
Motorola One Vision features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola One Vision features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola One Vision has a greater camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a camera with lot more MP, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.