Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy A30s, with an 81 score against 79.8. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features. Although Galaxy C9 Pro is extremely older and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A30s, it's body is still just a bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
The Galaxy A30s counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A30s has a little bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A30s also has a larger aperture to capture better low light images and video and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy A30s's battery lifetime is very similar to Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.