Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A31 construction is much newer and just a little lighter, but also way thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A31 has older 10 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a little bit better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit larger screen, a quite greater screen density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy A31 has a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A31 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A31 count with very similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy A31 has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A31 has improved battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy A31 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.