Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with a overall score of 83.8 against 81. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a extremely newer and lighter cellphone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's just a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A50 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A50 captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a much better 25 MP resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments.
Galaxy A50 has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50's battery duration is very similar to Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.