Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it is somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a larger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments. The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.