Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, with a score of 86.3 against 81. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body is extremely newer and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it is also somewhat thicker. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel count in each inch in the display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy C9 Pro has greater battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 29% larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.