Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, having a general score of 94.8 against 81. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though the Galaxy S20 is thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro, it's lighter and noticeably newer.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite bigger display, a lot higher display density and a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Galaxy S20 features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy C9 Pro and Galaxy S20 count with incredibly similar batteries duration. The Galaxy S20 has a better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.