Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Core
Dual SIMI8262
| Global Score | |
| 59.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-05-06 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.09 x 2.66 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8625 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 500 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is way better than the Galaxy Core's 59.8 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Galaxy Core has Android 4.1. The LG V50 ThinQ is a newer and just a little thinner phone than the Galaxy Core, although it is heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better display than Galaxy Core, because it has a really bigger display, a much greater pixel number per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy Core, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and more cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a greater camera than Galaxy Core, because it has a much better (4K) video definition and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy Core, because it has 120 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Core, because it has a 122% more battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Core, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.