Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-05-06 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.09 x 2.66 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.37 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8625 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 500 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is way better than Galaxy Core's 59.7 general score. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the newer 10 version and Galaxy Core has Android 4.1 version. The LG V50 ThinQ body is notably newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy Core's, but it is also extremely heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Core, because it has a lot better pixel quantity per inch of display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a much larger screen. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better processing power than Galaxy Core, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster).
LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better camera than Galaxy Core, because it has a much better (4K) video quality and a camera with a lot better 12 megapixels resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Core, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Core, because it has a 122% larger battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the Galaxy Core, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.