Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 362 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is better than the Galaxy A32's 84.7 global score. Galaxy Fold is an older and notably heavier cellphone than Galaxy A32, but Samsung was able to make it thinner anyway. Galaxy Fold comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS, while Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS.
The Galaxy Fold has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Fold counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher resolution of 1536 x 2152 and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy Fold features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A32 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.