Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)'s score of 71.8. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), it's much thinner and incredibly newer. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a lot bigger display and a greater pixels density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 496 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) features an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.