Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.04 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, with a score of 83.7 against 74.6. Although it's the best in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ's construction is a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a larger display and a lot higher screen pixels density. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit faster processor than Galaxy J7 Duo, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy J7 Duo, because although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a way better (4K) video resolution and a much bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Duo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.