Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Galaxy J7 Max's 76.1 global score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat. LG V50 ThinQ's design is newer, but just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than Galaxy J7 Max.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a quite bigger screen and more pixels per display inch. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ has superior battery performance than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.