Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-07-13 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 107.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro is better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, having a general score of 84.9 against 73.1. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy J7 Star counts with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro's body is newer and just a little bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star.
The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a superior performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a larger amount of RAM. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a bit bigger display, a lot better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a much higher display density.
Galaxy J7 Star counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 400 GB. Apple iPhone 11 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features a bit longer battery life than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy J7 Star, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy J7 Star. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 11 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy J7 Star, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.