Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy M10, getting an 83.7 score against 73.5. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, we must highlight that it's also a little thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones have Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Galaxy M10 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much sharper screen than Galaxy M10, because it has a lot better screen pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M10, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better processor than Samsung Galaxy M10, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M10, because it has an 18% bigger battery size. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy M10, because although it has a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a way larger camera aperture and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.