Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-29 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has an overall score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit's 77 overall score. The Galaxy M30s construction is newer than LG G7 Fit's, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy M30s has the previous 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy M30s features just a little better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy M30s also has a higher number of cores (and faster). LG G7 Fit features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy M30s features a much better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
LG G7 Fit features a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M30s features a really longer battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 100 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.