Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having an 83.3 score against 81.3. The Samsung Galaxy M30s construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a much longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. Galaxy M30s has a better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.