Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M30s, getting an 87.1 score against 83.3. LG Velvet is a thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy M30s, even when they were only released with a couple of months difference. The LG Velvet counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory.
LG Velvet and Galaxy M30s both have extremely similar displays, because although the LG Velvet has a little bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a quite bigger display. The LG Velvet's camera is just as good as Galaxy M30s's camera, and although the LG Velvet has a larger camera aperture for better captures in low light environments, they both have the same video frame rate, a back facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the same video definition and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
The LG Velvet features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy M30s counts with a much better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 40% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.