Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has a score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than the Moto G9 Power's global score of 78.6. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Galaxy M30s has 11 version while Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version. The Galaxy M30s construction is lighter and a little thinner than Moto G9 Power, even though it was released around 14 months before.
Galaxy M30s counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a lot higher quantity of pixels per display inch. Moto G9 Power features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G9 Power also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M30s has a little better performance than Moto G9 Power. They have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Moto G9 Power's battery performance is very similar to the battery duration in Galaxy M30s. Galaxy M30s has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a back camera with a way worse resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.