Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-29 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30s has an overall score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Play's general score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy M30s construction is way newer, but much heavier and much thicker than Moto Z2 Play. The Galaxy M30s features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a larger display and a just a bit higher pixels density.
Galaxy M30s features a bit superior CPU than Moto Z2 Play. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Galaxy M30s has a lot better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M30s features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.