Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30s is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, with an 83.3 score against 83.1. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M30s has newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy M30s is a a little lighter device than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a better pixels amount in each inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a quite bigger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a really longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 41 percent more battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a camera with a 48 MP, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger camera aperture, better 60 fps video frame rates and a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.