Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is slightly better than Galaxy M30s, getting an 88.3 score against 83.3. Galaxy S10's body is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Galaxy M30s, although both of them were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide very similar operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10 has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040px resolution and a better screen density.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a camera with way more MP and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a superior battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.