Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-29 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Galaxy M30s, with a overall score of 93.6 against 83.3. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G design is just a little bit heavier but somewhat thinner than the Galaxy M30s, and they were released with only 5 months difference. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy M30s, because it has a little greater screen pixels density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a little bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M30s has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy M30s counts with a better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a lot smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.