Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has an overall score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's score of 78.3. The Galaxy M30s design is extremely older, a little heavier and thicker than vivo X70 Pro. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 operating system. Vivo X70 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a screen that is just as good as Galaxy M30s's display, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2376 resolution. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has greater battery duration than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 35 percent larger battery capacity. Vivo X70 Pro shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has better video frame rate, a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos, a back camera with a better 50 MP resolution and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.