Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy M31's global score of 86.5. The Apple iPhone X design is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy M31, even though it was released 2 years before. The Apple iPhone X counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy M31, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone X features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy M31, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, more brightness and a just a little better count of pixels per screen inch. The Apple iPhone X has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy M31 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.