Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a score of 86.5, which is better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 score. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M31 has an older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Although the Samsung Galaxy M31 is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
LG G7 Fit has a sharper screen than Galaxy M31, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density, way more brightness and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG G7 Fit counts with a little bit better memory for games and applications than Galaxy M31, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M31 has a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M31 features a superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 100% greater battery size. Galaxy M31 counts with a greater camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy M31 also has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.