Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 is better than LG K52, getting a overall score of 86.5 against 76. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M31 has 11 version and LG K52 has Android 10 version, so it provides a lot of extra features. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M31 body is just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than the LG K52.
Galaxy M31 has a little faster processing unit than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy M31 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M31 has a much better looking display than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a lot better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy M31 has a lot better camera than LG K52, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy M31 also has a back camera with a much better resolution, a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos. LG K52 features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M31 features a superior battery performance than LG K52, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.