Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Sky Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is better than the LG K62's score of 78.2. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M31 has a newer 11 version while LG K62 has Android 10 version, so it gives some additional features and increased performance. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, we must note that it is also a little bit heavier and just a little thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG K62, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy M31 counts with a much better screen than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixel density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Galaxy M31 features a much better camera than LG K62, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy M31 also has a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a lot higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels. LG K62 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M31, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy M31 has a really longer battery lifetime than LG K62, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.