Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is a bit better than the LG K92's 85.4 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy M31 and the LG K92 were released only 8 months apart, Samsung Galaxy M31's body is just a little bit lighter but also a little bit thicker than the LG K92. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M31 has the newer 11 version while LG K92 has Android 10, providing you lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features just a little better processing power than LG K92. Both have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. Galaxy M31 features a little more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
The LG K92 features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M31 counts with a much better battery life than LG K92, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy M31 counts with a little bit better camera than LG K92, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates, a 64 megapixels camera and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M31 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.