Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mirror black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 is better than LG Q70, getting a score of 86.5 against 77.9. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M31 has a newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M31 and LG Q70 were only released 2 months apart, Samsung Galaxy M31's construction is just a little thicker but just a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a little sharper display than LG Q70, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has a little bit higher screen pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2340px resolution. Samsung Galaxy M31 has just a little better performance than LG Q70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has more RAM memory.
LG Q70 counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Q70 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M31 has a way better battery lifetime than LG Q70, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a better camera than LG Q70, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M31 also has a much bigger sensor and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.