Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Holographic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 is better than LG Stylo 6, getting an 86.5 score against 76.7. Galaxy M31's construction is a little thicker but somewhat lighter than the LG Stylo 6, and they were released with only 3 months difference. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M31 has a newer 11 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10.
The Galaxy M31 features a bit better screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount in each inch in the display. LG Stylo 6 has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG Stylo 6 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M31 counts with a bit better processing power than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy M31 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M31 has a much better camera than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy M31 also has a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a lot larger sensor and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a very superior battery duration than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.